Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hypertens ; 41(11): 1831-1843, 2023 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37682076

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Kidney angiotensin (Ang) II is produced mainly from liver-derived, glomerular-filtered angiotensinogen (AGT). Podocyte injury has been reported to increase the kidney Ang II content and induce Na + retention depending on the function of megalin, a proximal tubular endocytosis receptor. However, how megalin regulates the renal content and action of Ang II remains elusive. METHODS: We used a mass spectrometry-based, parallel reaction-monitoring assay to quantitate Ang II in plasma, urine, and kidney homogenate of kidney-specific conditional megalin knockout (MegKO) and control (Ctl) mice. We also evaluated the pathophysiological changes in both mouse genotypes under the basal condition and under the condition of increased glomerular filtration of AGT induced by administration of recombinant mouse AGT (rec-mAGT). RESULTS: Under the basal condition, plasma and kidney Ang II levels were comparable in the two mouse groups. Ang II was detected abundantly in fresh spot urine in conditional MegKO mice. Megalin was also found to mediate the uptake of intravenously administered fluorescent Ang II by PTECs. Administration of rec-mAGT increased kidney Ang II, exerted renal extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) signaling, activated proximal tubular Na + -H + exchanger 3 (NHE3), and decreased urinary Na + excretion in Ctl mice, whereas these changes were suppressed but urinary Ang II was increased in conditional MegKO mice. CONCLUSION: Increased glomerular filtration of AGT is likely to augment Ang II production in the proximal tubular lumen. Thus, megalin-dependent Ang II uptake should be involved in the ERK1/2 signaling that activates proximal tubular NHE3 in vivo , thereby causing Na + retention.


Assuntos
Angiotensina II , Angiotensinogênio , Animais , Camundongos , Angiotensina II/farmacologia , Angiotensinogênio/genética , Angiotensinogênio/metabolismo , Túbulos Renais Proximais , Proteína-2 Relacionada a Receptor de Lipoproteína de Baixa Densidade/genética , Proteína-2 Relacionada a Receptor de Lipoproteína de Baixa Densidade/metabolismo , Sistema de Sinalização das MAP Quinases , Proteína Quinase 3 Ativada por Mitógeno/metabolismo , Sódio/metabolismo , Trocador 3 de Sódio-Hidrogênio/metabolismo
2.
Diabetes Ther ; 12(3): 655-667, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33474645

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors are widely used in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on maintenance hemodialysis (HD), but the efficacy of the once-weekly DPP4 inhibitor omarigliptin is not known. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority/superiority, once-daily DPP4 inhibitor linagliptin-controlled, multicenter study examined glycemic control and safety of omarigliptin (UMIN000024284). Sample size was calculated to confirm non-inferiority in terms of changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). We enrolled 33 patients with T2DM on maintenance HD who had been treated with linagliptin for at least 3 months. The patients were randomized to receive omarigliptin (12.5 mg/week; n = 16) or linagliptin (5 mg/day; n = 17). Primary endpoints were changes in HbA1c and glycoalbumin (GA) over 24 weeks. RESULTS: Differences in the mean change in primary endpoint values between the omarigliptin and linagliptin groups were - 0.61% [- 1.14, - 0.09] for HbA1c, with a two-tailed upper 95% limit (i.e., one-tailed 97.5% upper limit) of 0.25%, below the non-inferiority limit, and - 1.67% [- 4.23, + 0.88] for GA, with a two-tailed upper 95% limit of 0.75%, above the non-inferiority limit. At 24 weeks, the omarigliptin group showed significantly greater reduction in HbA1c than the linagliptin group (- 0.2% ± 0.6% vs. 0.4% ± 0.8%, two-tailed p = 0.024) and significantly greater reduction in blood glucose after a single HD session (- 18.4 ± 31.4 mg/dL vs. 25.2 ± 59.5 mg/dL, respectively, two-tailed p = 0.019). No subjects in the omarigliptin group developed hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that omarigliptin was non-inferior to linagliptin in glycemic control. Omarigliptin is feasible for glycemic control in patients with T2DM on maintenance HD. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: UMIN000024284.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...